-rep How far should it go?
 

The things I have recently noticed is their are several members of ezud with negative rep. But how far should rep go negative? I mean after so long I think it should become aparent that these people have nothing to contribute to ezud and they are just here to cause problems.

The people with excessive negative rep do not follow ezuds rules and I believe after so long they should receive bans.

Some people have more negative rep then I have positive rep is that telling you guys anything?

Agreed.
Such as; Awannabe, and I Live To Glitch Rs.
They are both in the -100 rep area I believe.
Both spammed the hell out of Ezud when they joined and now they knocked it off and just post stupid things from time to time.


SPEAKING OF THIS GUY, I reload the page and see a post by him.
How does that contribute to the bug that was posted?

I believe this is true to. If you have over like for example lets say -200 rep. You should not have the right to stay here. If you have that much negative rep obviously there's something they are doing wrong.

Thankfully people are agreeing with me. today a member cussed me out because he was wrong and he has -185 rep. Disrespectful to other members/mods? No wonder your rep is so low.

i say they should be banned at -150 rep.

but what if somebody is at -130 rep, and i just go and ban them for no reason. that wouldn't really be fair.

i say at -50 to -100 rep should allow teh banhammerz!

I suggest, when you go above -100 rep, you should be banned.

Rep does not put you in a higher rank then a person. Banning someone for simply having -100 rep is nothing. Rep just shows the quality of noticed posts you make over a certain amount of time.

"i live to glitch rs" was banned last night, I saw a spam post, infracted, and he got 10 points, banz0rez.

Hmm i personally agree with fluid, if someone has like -150 rep there obviously a trouble causer, but this will suck cos memebers will just -rep people they dont like or something JUST to get them banned.