Quote:
|
Just because i am trusted doesn't mean i "Used" my trust to get access.
|
You did "Use" your trust as without it you wouldn't have got onto the account. You obviously indirectly used as you didn't message him on MSN saying "I'm trusted let me on your account". Nethertheless you used it.
Quote:
|
I don't believe it is a scam to ask to use an account before you actually pay for it.
|
Obviously not. Just like taking someone for a ride in your car isn't murder; its what you do while on the journey.
Quote:
|
I did not use all the money on the account, infact when been got back on the account weeks later it had more money then it did to begin with.
|
While you were on the account ben also had access. During this 6 hour time gap he would check on the account and make sure was everything was in its place. He saw the money gradually decline and was getting worried that you wouldnt pay up. One day he logged and nothing was on it - no void, no money. He obviously started to panic but still waited to hear your response. This is when it started to become 'Fats problem' and you backed out of the trade offering to phish some of the money back. Ben just wanted his money therefore said yes to this despite the risk. Fat started phising money and when 12M was on the account fat said there would be a delay in recieving the rest ( I forget the reason). Ben then thought 'I'm not having this all over again' and took what he could to limit the damage.
If you didn't scam Ben then Fat did? Fat was on the account because Ben trusted you and hence him with access.