Ban Mezalza

[Pirate]

Originally Posted by Fatality

Goller do you listen, i told you do not post in this thread to begin with. Next this is another reason why i closed this thread, because people who aren't involved and don't know whats going on make random assumptions. Mezala is unbanned because he was willing to work out a deal to repay fat, and he was ok with the deal. So basicly they are even. Now onto your little suggestion... i offered to get ben the full void back but he did not want me to stay on the account for that long, so how am i at fault. Next me and fat offered to give him like 15m to pay for the lost items + void and give the account back in the condition its in, and ben did not really want that he wanted us to buy it. Also the stuff that's blocked out in the convo is personal stuff, which i do not share with random people. If your extremely interested in what it said i would be glad to tell you. Finally i will not unban him because he owes you a password, if you want it so bad take it up with him on msn.

Im glad to hear what it says.

I dont care what you say about not posting my opinion, because, this is still Ezud Discussion.
Also, I understand Ben his position, because, you scammed him.Thats clear, so why would he trust you again?Please tell me that?

I would like to say this :
ROW ROW FIGHT THA POWAH!
/Sherlock Power

Thats it for now, Goller

Originally Posted by EndOfStory?

What, and you think he would have let ANYONE on it? No I don't think so; he trusted that were going to actually buy the account and that you wouldn't just take 5m and disappear. If you wern't so respected and trusted he wouldn't have let you anywhere near it.


I'm aware of the cirumstances that the void was lost, although not directly you you must take some responsibility as the account was in your possession. THis is why in my original post "And Fatality's role is this needs to be reviewed because he used his trust to access the account then procceeded to use 5m and then withdrew from the trade". Notice the exclusion of full void? Maybe choose a more worthy parnter in future - what idiot transfers in void?


Then what do you call:
1) Asking someone for access to an account which you will pay for later
2) Using all the money on this account
3) Pulling out of the deal.

Thats as far as I know. Your turn.

Just because i am trusted doesn't mean i "Used" my trust to get access. See there's a difference between using your trust and being trusted.

Now onto the account and void AGAIN. Ben had let me use the account to get his money to him, and the only way i could've is by letting fat help me xfer. You have to remember ben has a 6 hour time difference from me and is rarely on when im on. Also where are you getting i proceeded to use 5m.

Then what do you call:
1) Asking someone for access to an account which you will pay for later
2) Using all the money on this account
3) Pulling out of the deal.

I don't believe it is a scam to ask to use an account before you actually pay for it.

I did not use all the money on the account, infact when been got back on the account weeks later it had more money then it did to begin with.

Yes i did pull out of the deal after i made sure there was enough money to replace the void and money on the account , that was on their previously.

Originally Posted by Goller

Im glad to hear what it says.

I dont care what you say about not posting my opinion, because, this is still Ezud Discussion.
Also, I understand Ben his position, because, you scammed him.Thats clear, so why would he trust you again?Please tell me that?

I would like to say this :
ROW ROW FIGHT THA POWAH!
/Sherlock Power

Thats it for now, Goller

Wow you make yourself look more immature every time you speak. Not only can you not read, but you also apparently cant listen. Even Ben himself said i did not scam him... What more proof is needed. Also the only reason why this is in ezud discussion is because the other fail's at putting topics in the right section.

[EndOfStory?]

Just because i am trusted doesn't mean i "Used" my trust to get access.

You did "Use" your trust as without it you wouldn't have got onto the account. You obviously indirectly used as you didn't message him on MSN saying "I'm trusted let me on your account". Nethertheless you used it.

I don't believe it is a scam to ask to use an account before you actually pay for it.

Obviously not. Just like taking someone for a ride in your car isn't murder; its what you do while on the journey.

I did not use all the money on the account, infact when been got back on the account weeks later it had more money then it did to begin with.

While you were on the account ben also had access. During this 6 hour time gap he would check on the account and make sure was everything was in its place. He saw the money gradually decline and was getting worried that you wouldnt pay up. One day he logged and nothing was on it - no void, no money. He obviously started to panic but still waited to hear your response. This is when it started to become 'Fats problem' and you backed out of the trade offering to phish some of the money back. Ben just wanted his money therefore said yes to this despite the risk. Fat started phising money and when 12M was on the account fat said there would be a delay in recieving the rest ( I forget the reason). Ben then thought 'I'm not having this all over again' and took what he could to limit the damage.

If you didn't scam Ben then Fat did? Fat was on the account because Ben trusted you and hence him with access.