Process

Inclusive Design Research Methods

By EZUD Published · Updated

Inclusive Design Research Methods

Inclusive design research ensures that the needs, preferences, and barriers experienced by people with disabilities inform product decisions from the earliest stages. Standard UX research methods can be adapted for inclusivity, and some methods are specifically designed for it. The goal is not to create a separate research track for disability but to make all research inclusive by default.

Adapting Standard Methods

Contextual Inquiry

Contextual inquiry involves observing users in their natural environment as they use your product or similar products. When conducted with disabled users, it reveals assistive technology workflows, environmental factors (lighting, noise, physical setup), and workarounds that surveys and interviews miss.

Adaptation: Visit participants in their own workspace where their assistive technology is configured to their preferences. Do not bring a test laptop with default settings. Ask participants to narrate their thought process as they navigate.

Semi-Structured Interviews

Interviews with disabled users surface qualitative insights about barriers, frustrations, and unmet needs. They also reveal how people describe accessibility problems, which informs content, error messages, and help documentation.

Adaptation: Offer multiple interview formats (video call, phone, text-based chat) to accommodate different communication preferences. Provide questions in advance so participants can prepare. Allow extra time.

Surveys

Surveys reach a larger population than interviews or usability tests. Include questions about assistive technology use, disability type, and accessibility preferences. Use these responses to segment analysis.

Adaptation: Ensure the survey tool itself is accessible (keyboard navigable, screen reader compatible, sufficient contrast). Test the survey with a screen reader before distributing. Provide alternative formats (phone survey, paper form) if needed.

Card Sorting and Tree Testing

These methods evaluate information architecture. When conducted with disabled users, they reveal whether navigation structure, labels, and hierarchy work for people using assistive technology.

Adaptation: Use accessible tools (OptimalSort has been tested for basic screen reader compatibility). For in-person sessions, provide physical cards that are tactile and labeled in large print or braille. Allow participants to sort verbally if physical manipulation is difficult.

Methods Designed for Inclusion

Co-Design

Co-design involves disabled people as active creators, not just research subjects. Participants contribute ideas, evaluate prototypes, and shape design decisions alongside designers and developers. See our dedicated article on co-design with disabled users.

Persona Spectrums

Rather than fixed personas, persona spectrums (developed by the Inclusive Design Research Centre at OCAD University and popularized by Microsoft’s Inclusive Design Toolkit) map needs along a spectrum from permanent to temporary to situational disability. This method helps teams recognize that accessibility solutions benefit a wider population than any single disability category.

See personas in inclusive design for detailed guidance.

Assistive Technology Walkthroughs

A researcher or accessibility specialist navigates the product using specific assistive technologies (screen reader, switch access, voice control, magnification) and documents the experience. This is not a WCAG audit but a narrative walkthrough that captures the flow, frustration, and cognitive load of the experience.

This method bridges the gap between formal audits and usability testing. It provides rich qualitative data without the recruitment overhead of participant testing.

Diary Studies

Participants document their experiences with a product over days or weeks, noting barriers, workarounds, and successes in the context of daily life. Diary studies with disabled participants capture intermittent issues, fatigue effects, and the cumulative impact of accessibility barriers that one-time testing sessions miss.

Adaptation: Offer multiple recording methods (text, audio, video). Do not require a specific app that may not be accessible.

Recruitment and Ethics

  • Recruit through disability organizations, accessibility panels (Fable, AccessWorks), and university disability services. See user testing with people with disabilities for detailed recruitment guidance.
  • Compensate participants fairly for their time and expertise.
  • Obtain informed consent in accessible formats.
  • Do not share identifying information without explicit permission.
  • Recognize that research with disabled participants may require IRB or ethics board review, particularly in academic or healthcare contexts.

Integrating Findings

Research findings are only valuable if they influence design decisions. To ensure integration:

  • Present findings in design reviews and sprint planning sessions.
  • Map findings to inclusive personas and user journey maps.
  • Create accessibility-specific design guidelines based on research insights.
  • Track which research findings have been addressed and which remain open, using your accessibility metrics and documentation systems.

Key Takeaways

  • Adapt standard UX research methods (contextual inquiry, interviews, surveys, card sorting) for inclusion by accommodating diverse communication and interaction needs.
  • Co-design, persona spectrums, assistive technology walkthroughs, and diary studies are methods purpose-built for inclusive research.
  • Recruit through established disability organizations and accessibility panels, and compensate participants fairly.
  • Integrate findings into design reviews, personas, and sprint planning to ensure they inform real decisions.
  • Make all research inclusive by default rather than creating a separate disability research track.

Sources

More in Process

Inclusive Design Process Guide: Building Accessibility Into Every Stage Guide Continuous Accessibility Monitoring Accessibility in Design Reviews Nothing About Us Without Us: The Principle That Shapes Inclusive Design

View all Process articles →