Does the UK need a Monarchy - Debate

[Despair]

Nah, Zack thats what prime ministers' are for. ; )

Hereditary succession of the crown may no longer outweigh the influence of constitutional parliament. Which remind you is still effectively gives power to the people. A frequently changing pime minister allows for a change in rule when a bush comes to office (Wow I hope I don't get blamed for that one.) and are not appointed to a specific term. Where as the Monarch is always going to give unified status symbol and for the country to rely on for an internal source of publicity and culture. I don't particularly hold ground as far or taxing goes, I am undecided weather the born in lack of privacy is compensatable in this scenario.